Legislation Details

File #: ID 2026-174    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Discussion and Possible Action Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 6/22/2026 In control: Regular City Commission Meeting
On agenda: 7/1/2026 Final action:
Title: DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION - STAFF AUTHORIZATION TO NEGOTIATE AN AGREEMENT WITH FORT LAUDERDALE FOOTBALL CLUB, LLC D/B/A FORT LAUDERDALE UNITED FC FOR THE DEVELOPMENT, OPERATION, AND MANAGEMENT OF A COMPREHENSIVE YOUTH SOCCER AND MULTI-SPORT COMMUNITY PROGRAMMING PLATFORM ON CITY-OWNED RECREATIONAL FACILITIES AND FIELDS.
Attachments: 1. BACKGROUND 1, 2. BACKGROUND 2
Date Ver.Action ByActionResultAction DetailsMeeting DetailsAudio/Video
No records to display.

TO: Mayor and City Commission

FROM: Cale Curtis, City Manager

DATE: July 1, 2026


Title
DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION - STAFF AUTHORIZATION TO NEGOTIATE AN AGREEMENT WITH FORT LAUDERDALE FOOTBALL CLUB, LLC D/B/A FORT LAUDERDALE UNITED FC FOR THE DEVELOPMENT, OPERATION, AND MANAGEMENT OF A COMPREHENSIVE YOUTH SOCCER AND MULTI-SPORT COMMUNITY PROGRAMMING PLATFORM ON CITY-OWNED RECREATIONAL FACILITIES AND FIELDS.

Body


BACKGROUND:
FTL UTD submitted an unsolicited proposal pursuant to Section 255.065, Florida Statutes, to operate youth soccer and multi-sport programming on City-owned facilities in partnership with the City. The proposal includes soccer, flag football, futsal, lacrosse, clinics, scholarships, tournaments, and field improvements under a co-branded "Margate United FTL UTD" platform.

Proposed benefits include:
* Annual field improvement funding of at least $100,000;
* Scholarships and youth financial assistance;
* Professional coaching and operational support;
* Revenue sharing from registrations and tournaments; and
* Potential contributions toward future sports complex improvements.

The term sheet also requests:
* Exclusive rights to youth flag football;
* Right of First Refusal (ROFR) for certain field uses;
* Designated use of City facilities and guaranteed field hours;
* Five-year terms with automatic renewals; and
* Reimbursement of certain investments upon termination.

No binding agreement currently exists.

The proposal may provide additional programming opportunities, scholarships, facility investments, and operational support without requiring direct General Fund support for program operations. However, several proposed terms raise policy and operational concerns, including:
* Preserving the City's recreation-first philosophy;
* Maintaining City control over public facilities and scheduling;
* Avoiding exclusivity arrangements and long-term encumbrances;
* Protecting future Commission flexibility;
* Ensuring resident ...

Click here for full text